Business
Making a Positive Impression
By Evelyn Jacobson on September 3, 2008 11:10 AM
New research from the USC Marshall School of Business reveals that when people are trying to make a positive impression, they may behave in ways that contradict gender stereotypes, but not necessarily to their benefit.
The study, carried out by Jennifer Overbeck of USC Marshall and Jared Curhan of MIT’s Sloan School of Management, assigned 190 MBA students to same-sex groups to represent either a high-status recruiter or a low-status job candidate engaged in a standard employment negotiation simulation.
Half of the participants were offered an additional cash incentive to make a positive impression on their negotiation counterparts. Given the incentive, men and women in the high-status role acted in ways that contradicted gender stereotypes. Women negotiated more aggressively and men negotiated in a more appeasing manner.
“The findings were surprising,” said Overbeck, an assistant professor of management and organization who has taught negotiation to USC Marshall MBA students for five years. “We thought the impression motivator would intensify impression response, meaning that if you were conciliatory, you’d become more so, but being aware of making a good impression made the subjects do the opposite.”
In the study, women who were motivated to make a positive impression, perhaps in an effort to refute the stereotype that they are weak or ineffective negotiators, advocated more strongly for their own interests. In contrast, men who were motivated to make a positive impression, perhaps in an effort to refute the stereotype that they are overly aggressive, yielded to the demands of the other side.
While the men’s strategy of behaving in a more conciliatory fashion apparently succeeded in producing a positive impression in the counterparts’ eyes, the women’s strategy of behaving more assertively failed to create a more positive impression. Instead, women who behaved more assertively were judged more negatively.
“Men who try to make a positive impression by being conciliatory risk forfeiting their own economic outcomes and women who try to make positive impressions by being assertive can risk damaging their relationships,” Overbeck said.
“One implication of the study is that people have a menu of options when it comes to negotiating behavior and they need to choose strategically. If you are establishing a new relationship, you can take a hit financially; when the economic outcome is more important and the relationship isn’t needed or already established, more aggressive tactics can be pulled out from time to time,” she explained.
“Our recommendation is that the more negotiators of both sexes are conscious of dynamics affecting negotiation, the more planning or practicing they can and should do.”
The study was published in the journal Negotiation and Conflict Management Research.
TAGS: research
Latest Business stories
- Navy Veteran Sets Sail for Consulting Job January 25, 2012 2:21 PM
- Is There a Dark Side to Moving in Sync? January 23, 2012 10:41 AM
- Young Entrepreneurs on the Clock January 20, 2012 8:00 AM
-
For Journalists »
-
USC in the News
for 2/8/2012 »-
The Chronicle of Higher Education mentioned USC’s $6 billion fundraising campaign. The story noted that USC had already raised $1 billion in a “quiet phase,” including the $200 million naming gift from USC Trustee and alumnus David Dornsife and wife Dana Dornsife to the USC Dornsife College.
The Guardian (U.K.) highlighted two major gifts to USC in a list of the 10 biggest philanthropic benefactors in America. The list included the $200 million naming gift from USC Trustee and alumnus David Dornsife and wife Dana Dornsife to the USC Dornsife College, and the $110 million gift from USC Trustee and USC Viterbi School alumnus John Mork and wife Julie to create the USC Mork Family Scholars Program.
The New York Times featured the USC U.S.-China Institute documentary “Assignment: China — The Week that Changed the World.” The documentary, part of a series, examines media coverage of the 1972 Nixon trip that reshaped U.S.-China relations after a quarter century of isolation and hostility. “People look back now and take it for granted that the outcome was preordained,” said the institute’s Mike Chinoy, who produced the documentary. Voice of America also featured the story.
Los Angeles Times featured the Oscar Senti-meter, a tool developed by the USC Annenberg School, Los Angeles Times and IBM that analyzes thousands of tweets about the Academy Awards nominees. The story noted that Mexican actor Demian Bechir received an enormous boost on Twitter the day of the nominations, with a total of 6,893 tweets mentioning him, a 47-fold increase from the day before. The story noted the tool uses language-recognition technology developed in collaboration with USC Viterbi School’s Signal Analysis and Interpretation Lab.
The Times of India (India) featured a three-day medical emergency training workshop organized in association with USC. At the workshop, held at GCS Medical College in India, 50 doctors and more than 100 paramedics learned how to improve emergency support systems. William Mallon of the Keck School of USC said that discussion topics included the use of portable ultrasonic devices to scan patients. “The ultrasound applications help physicians make accurate and timely decisions,” he noted. Daily News & Analysis (India) also featured the workshop.
-
-
Campus News
- Capital Connections
- USC faculty, staff and alumni in Washington, D.C., and Sacramento
- In Print
- New and recent books written or edited by USC faculty and staff
- Family Matters
- Achievements and awards
- Obituaries

